Bicyclist Rights Against Public Entities: Liabilities

Richard Duquette of 911 Law provides a summary of the procedural hazards plaintiffs face when they try to assert a claim against a government entity, and the steps to take if you find yourself in these circumstances.

This article is adapted from Richard Duquette’s podcast Bicycling and the Law, episode ‘Bicyclists’ Rights Against Public Entities: Potholes to Trails Part 1 – Procedure‘ 
recorded on January 25, 2017.

Historically, public entities have been immune from liability. This immunity was known as “sovereign immunity.” The idea behind this ancient doctrine was rooted in the divine right of kings, with the belief that when acting in his official capacity, “the king could do no wrong.” In the modern era this has changed. In 1963, the California Tort Claims Act (CTCA) was created through legislation. Following a trend set by the courts that immunity should be the exception rather than the rule, the CTCA essentially says there is no public entity immunity except when allowed by statute.


So, assuming you have a meritorious case against a government entity and sovereign immunity does not apply, what happens next? There are a number of things you need to be aware of that make these cases procedurally more challenging than a case against a private entity.

First is the issue of place. Unlike when suing a private company or individual, you cannot just go straight to court. At this stage in the process, the claim is an administrative one, not a judicial one. You have to first file a written notice of claim with the government entity you intend to sue (Gov. Code §910).

Most public entities have their own form available online to streamline this process. These forms must contain relevant information and the factual basis for your claim. So in addition to filling them out properly, you should attach a copy of the police report, pictures, and proof of your damages in order to comply. If you do not know which public entity owns the land, you should file a claim with each entity that may possibly own it. You may not know whether the land you were injured upon belongs to the state, the city, or the county. In that case, file with all three. The agencies that do not own or control the property will send notice. San Diego County provides its claim form as an example of how the process works in practice. In some cases you will want to make sure not only that you have the right vertical entity (state, county, city), but also the right horizontal entity. For instance, depending on your injury your claim may be against the local park district or the local transit district.

Second, and equally important, is the issue of timing. Public entity claims have an accelerated statute of limitations. The typical personal injury case has a statute of limitations of two years, meaning that you have two years after the injury to file a lawsuit, after which your claim will be barred (Code of Civil Procedure §335.1). But with government claims, you have only six months to file the government claim form required to comply with the administrative process outlined above (Gov. Code §911.2).

After this, the relevant entity will either admit liability or reject your claim. The public entity has forty-five (45) days to respond (Gov. Code §912.4). Failure to respond within this time is deemed a rejection, although it has a different effect. If your claim is formally rejected by written notice, you have six months to file suit, measured from the day written rejection of the claim was delivered (Gov. Code §§913, 945.6). If written notice of rejection is not given, though the claim is still rejected, you have two years from the date of the injury to file suit, as with an ordinary personal injury claim (Gov. Code §945.6(a)(2)).

Finally, once you get to court, there are additional pitfalls. Remember that there are always a few built-in disadvantages to plaintiffs litigating against the government. First, even in cases where sovereign immunity doesn’t apply, plaintiffs still cannot recover punitive damages against government agencies. This is because the deterrent rationale of punitive damages is not believed to apply to such cases. Second, the risk of ending up before a jury of taxpayers who are biased against such claims is significant. Moreover, if you do lose, the government will seek to recover their costs against you, which could include liening your home equity.


The above is a summary of the procedural hazards plaintiffs face when they try to assert a claim against a government entity. These pitfalls are precisely why it is important that you get a wise and experienced attorney to help you with your claim, so you don’t lose an otherwise winnable case. If you find yourself in such circumstances, we encourage you to contact the Law Firm of Richard Duquette for assistance with your case.

You can visit the Richard L. Duquette Law Firm blog to read more about bicycling and the law, and you can also hear more on his podcast, Podcast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
Read More

Lost Earning Capacity Part I: General Principals

There are two basic categories of damages in a personal injury case: special damages and general damages. Special damages refer to the direct, quantifiable pecuniary loss that can be traced to the accident. General damages, on the other hand, refer to other, less readily quantifiable losses such as pain and suffering, diminished quality of life, and emotional distress.
Read More
Read More

The Economics of Justice in a Small Bicycle Injury Case

As the insurance industry pumped millions of dollars into tort reform by way of advertising and politics, life changed for consumers, including bicycle crash victims. Currently it’s common place to see a settlement offer of only $1,000.00 on a $3,000.00 case, with an offer to pay only your medical bills. Attorney fees and victim pain and suffering have taken a big hit.
Read More
Read More

Bicycles and Wrongful Death Part I: Proving Fault

This three-part article addresses the question of what legal remedies exist for the surviving family of a bicyclist who is killed by a negligent driver. Part one of this article discusses proving fault, and the distinction between wrongful death claims and a survival action. Part two discusses the classes of plaintiffs who may bring a wrongful death action. Part three explains the types of damages that are available to them.
Read More
Read More

DMV Justice: The Department of Motor Vehicles Re-Examination Process

What can you do when hit and seriously injured by a motorist you believe should not be driving to due to age or a mental or physical disability in order to protect others using the roads in the future? Following a fatal or serious injury accident, the Department of Motor Vehicles has authority to investigate and require a re-examination to determine whether the negligent drivers driving privileges should be revoked, suspended, restricted, or placed on probation.
Read More